Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT

IMO: 9776432
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 122,364 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 144,777 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

329

Container median 178 kg/nm (+85%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.10

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−63%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

112.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,546 t

CO₂ emitted

64,144 t

Distance sailed

62,402 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,366 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 301 kg/nm · median 177 (+70%)

78.8Ranks 1,981 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.67 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 296 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU40%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

19,375 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3,124 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−6%	−12%	+22%	+9%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.0 kn	+6%	+21%	+17%	+7%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−9%	−7%	+1%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−12%	−15%	−2%	+13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	+6%	−4%	+2%	+11%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	+12%	+6%	+34%	+17%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−19%	−16%	+197%	−31%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	26,932	83,936	89,433	5,806	15.4	301	7.67	98%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	23,468	73,159	73,550	4,439	16.6	319	7.01	98%
2023	not published	18,903	58,966	62,849	4,316	14.6	301	6.58	95%
2022	not published	20,546	64,144	62,402	4,366	14.3	329	7.10	94%
2021	not published	23,705	74,074	63,516	4,257	14.9	373	6.30	97%
2020	not published	21,807	68,517	62,169	3,769	16.5	351	5.70	–
2019	not published	14,592	45,539	46,545	2,664	17.5	314	4.87	97%
2018	not published	6,068	18,928	15,670	934	16.8	387	7.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	7.67	16.3	−53%	296 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	7.01	17.5	−60%	154 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.58	19.4	−66%	114 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.10	19.1	−63%	150 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	6.30	17.9	−65%	84 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.70	17.6	−68%	31 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	4.87	18.9	−74%	2 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.07	20.2	−65%	63 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.