Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANNA

IMO: 9777204
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 127,653 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.39 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 140,680 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

333

Container median 182 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.38

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−64%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,700 t

CO₂ emitted

52,105 t

Distance sailed

50,187 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,734 h

156 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 299 kg/nm · median 177 (+69%)

78.8Ranks 1,972 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−55%)

7.22Ranks 232 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU41%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,376 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANNA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANNA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANNA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.0 kn	−1%	−19%	+24%	+31%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+6.4 kn	+12%	+80%	+65%	−8%	6.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−13%	−24%	−14%	−9%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	+11%	+26%	+5%	+13%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.8 kn	−12%	−35%	−34%	−14%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	+8%	−1%	−55%	−4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.4 kn	−11%	+4%	−22%	−3%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	6,471	20,203	21,680	1,547	14.0	299	7.30	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	5,290	16,485	17,516	1,028	17.0	302	5.56	–
2023	not published	2,865	8,995	10,631	1,005	10.6	270	6.06	–
2022	not published	3,808	11,916	12,296	1,009	12.2	310	6.69	–
2021	not published	3,259	10,180	11,658	1,085	10.7	280	5.94	–
2020	not published	5,659	17,668	17,734	1,224	14.5	319	6.87	–
2019	not published	11,550	36,061	39,129	2,476	15.8	295	7.13	–
2018	not published	16,700	52,105	50,187	3,734	13.4	333	7.38	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	7.30	16.3	−55%	232 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	5.56	17.5	−68%	32 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	6.06	19.4	−69%	65 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	6.69	19.1	−65%	102 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	5.94	17.9	−67%	52 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.87	17.6	−61%	158 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.13	18.9	−62%	127 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.38	20.2	−64%	89 of 1,705	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.