Navalyze · Container · Ship

VALPARAISO EXPRESS

IMO: 9777589
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 84,432 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 69,415 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

252

Container median 165 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−41%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

88.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,485 t

CO₂ emitted

39,069 t

Distance sailed

49,458 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,385 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 253 kg/nm · median 177 (+43%)

78.8Ranks 1,678 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 13.3 (+8%)

9.1Faster than 67% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 499 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU36%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,383 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VALPARAISO EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VALPARAISO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VALPARAISO EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	−1%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+0%	+1%	−4%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−19%	−29%	−7%	+1%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+0%	+4%	+8%	+5%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+6%	+4%	−3%	−6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+10%	+11%	−10%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−6%	−3%	−3%	+4%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	11,880	37,113	46,962	3,269	14.4	253	9.36	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	12,028	37,644	47,464	3,221	14.7	253	9.40	–
2023	not published	12,485	39,069	49,458	3,385	14.6	252	11.4	–
2022	not published	16,480	51,499	53,196	3,192	16.7	310	11.3	–
2021	not published	15,280	47,740	49,448	3,086	16.0	309	10.7	–
2020	not published	14,926	46,609	51,039	3,130	16.3	292	11.4	–
2019	not published	15,089	47,104	56,719	3,514	16.1	266	10.4	–
2018	not published	16,416	51,241	58,317	3,694	15.8	282	10.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.36	16.3	−43%	499 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.40	17.5	−46%	405 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	11.4	19.4	−41%	482 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	11.3	19.1	−41%	429 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	10.7	17.9	−40%	379 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	11.4	17.6	−35%	465 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	10.4	18.9	−45%	354 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	10.1	20.2	−50%	264 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.