Navalyze · Container · Ship

CALLAO EXPRESS

IMO: 9777606
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 87,110 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 78,263 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

270

Container median 172 kg/nm (+57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−39%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,751 t

CO₂ emitted

46,040 t

Distance sailed

54,621 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,305 h

138 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 259 kg/nm · median 177 (+46%)

78.8Ranks 1,729 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 495 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU41%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,510 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CALLAO EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CALLAO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CALLAO EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−3%	−9%	−11%	−6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	+3%	−15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−15%	−18%	−18%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	+8%	+1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+14%	+18%	−3%	−1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	+4%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	−13%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	11,199	34,991	43,193	2,811	15.4	259	9.30	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	12,936	40,445	48,438	2,953	16.4	267	9.85	–
2023	not published	12,091	37,796	47,052	2,946	16.0	257	11.6	–
2022	not published	17,293	54,050	57,234	3,456	16.6	302	10.7	–
2021	not published	16,362	51,087	52,917	3,099	17.1	309	10.6	–
2020	not published	14,751	46,040	54,621	3,305	16.5	270	10.8	–
2019	not published	13,807	43,104	52,687	3,241	16.3	262	10.4	–
2018	not published	16,384	51,137	60,395	3,650	16.5	271	10.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.30	16.3	−43%	495 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.85	17.5	−44%	438 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	11.6	19.4	−40%	499 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.7	19.1	−44%	374 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	10.6	17.9	−41%	372 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	10.8	17.6	−39%	428 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	10.4	18.9	−45%	349 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	10.0	20.2	−50%	263 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.