Navalyze · Container · Ship

GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS

IMO: 9777620
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 88,715 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 91,282 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

280

Container median 186 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.59

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−46%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,537 t

CO₂ emitted

48,508 t

Distance sailed

55,413 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,372 h

141 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 262 kg/nm · median 177 (+48%)

78.8Ranks 1,751 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 84% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 484 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU42%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,615 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−2%	−6%	−5%	−8%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	+17%	−10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−14%	−19%	−15%	+7%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+9%	+9%	−6%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+7%	+6%	−0%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	+5%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−8%	−10%	−0%	+7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	12,985	40,596	49,632	3,187	15.6	262	9.22	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,937	43,547	52,006	3,226	16.1	268	10.0	–
2023	not published	11,665	36,519	44,278	2,851	15.5	264	11.2	–
2022	not published	15,946	49,820	52,067	3,173	16.4	306	10.4	–
2021	not published	15,537	48,508	55,413	3,372	16.4	280	9.59	–
2020	not published	14,618	45,627	55,535	3,376	16.4	263	9.82	–
2019	not published	12,986	40,537	52,892	3,297	16.0	246	9.86	–
2018	not published	14,174	44,242	53,050	3,235	16.4	267	9.19	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.22	16.3	−43%	484 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	10.0	17.5	−43%	452 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	11.2	19.4	−42%	465 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	10.4	19.1	−46%	350 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	9.59	17.9	−46%	294 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	9.82	17.6	−44%	358 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	9.86	18.9	−48%	309 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	9.19	20.2	−55%	205 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.