Navalyze · Container · Ship

MOSCOW MAERSK

IMO: 9778818
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 140,690 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 175,882 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

307

Container median 174 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−71%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,631 t

CO₂ emitted

48,674 t

Distance sailed

50,872 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,081 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 294 kg/nm · median 177 (+66%)

78.8Ranks 1,945 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.51 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−60%)

7.22Ranks 124 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU12%
Into the EU69%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

15,631 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,251 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MOSCOW MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOSCOW MAERSK
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MOSCOW MAERSK
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+0%	+5%	+13%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+7%	+12%	+38%	+9%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−17%	−18%	+29%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+12%	+22%	−2%	+41%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−0%	−12%	+1%	−28%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−4%	−11%	−8%	+22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	−28%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	27,350	85,187	93,011	5,872	15.8	294	6.51	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	24,215	75,376	82,543	5,445	15.2	293	6.36	99%
2023	not published	16,379	51,003	59,866	4,119	14.5	274	5.84	98%
2022	not published	15,238	47,473	46,302	3,151	14.7	329	6.77	99%
2021	not published	13,964	43,485	47,428	3,513	13.5	294	4.79	–
2020	not published	13,831	43,069	46,902	3,060	15.3	295	6.65	100%
2019	not published	15,631	48,674	50,872	3,081	16.5	307	5.44	100%
2018	not published	22,851	71,261	70,865	4,295	16.5	322	6.84	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.51	16.3	−60%	124 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.36	17.5	−64%	101 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	5.84	19.4	−70%	46 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.77	19.1	−65%	113 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	4.79	17.9	−73%	4 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.65	17.6	−62%	140 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.44	18.9	−71%	14 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.84	20.2	−66%	46 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.