Navalyze · Container · Ship

MILAN MAERSK

IMO: 9778820
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 151,814 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 171,688 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

316

Container median 178 kg/nm (+78%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.73

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−70%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,048 t

CO₂ emitted

37,533 t

Distance sailed

38,153 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,623 h

109 days, 30% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 306 kg/nm · median 177 (+73%)

78.8Ranks 2,005 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.3 (+21%)

9.1Faster than 91% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−61%)

7.22Ranks 88 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU12%
Into the EU74%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

11,554 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,543 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MILAN MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MILAN MAERSK
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MILAN MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	−38%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+10%	+26%	+137%	+8%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−9%	−10%	−1%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−7%	−14%	−12%	+3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+0%	+5%	+29%	−2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	+8%	−1%	−45%	+1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−6%	−10%	−10%	−14%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	17,142	53,386	55,996	3,486	16.1	306	6.28	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	28,494	88,303	89,852	5,489	16.4	317	5.57	99%
2023	not published	10,912	33,982	37,864	2,652	14.3	288	5.17	96%
2022	not published	12,048	37,533	38,153	2,623	14.5	316	5.73	96%
2021	not published	14,825	45,503	43,586	2,775	15.7	340	5.55	–
2020	not published	11,451	35,669	33,806	2,241	15.1	339	5.65	100%
2019	not published	19,233	59,945	61,131	3,732	16.4	315	5.60	100%
2018	not published	22,848	71,301	68,096	3,970	17.2	336	6.49	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.28	16.3	−61%	88 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	5.57	17.5	−68%	36 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	5.17	19.4	−73%	15 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	5.73	19.1	−70%	18 of 1,825	ABS	–
2021	not published	5.55	17.9	−69%	23 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.65	17.6	−68%	27 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.60	18.9	−70%	20 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.49	20.2	−68%	22 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.