Navalyze · Container · Ship

MONACO MAERSK

IMO: 9778832
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 133,302 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 165,540 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

299

Container median 174 kg/nm (+72%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.63

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−70%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

118.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,610 t

CO₂ emitted

57,969 t

Distance sailed

62,200 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,773 h

157 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 274 kg/nm · median 177 (+55%)

78.8Ranks 1,824 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.3 (+18%)

9.1Faster than 86% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−61%)

7.22Ranks 104 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU29%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

18,610 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,710 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MONACO MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MONACO MAERSK
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MONACO MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+9%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−1%	+6%	+99%	+4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+6.1 kn	+0%	+72%	+172%	−20%	6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.4 kn	+1%	−22%	+78%	−9%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−4.7 kn	−9%	−36%	−79%	+14%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+7%	+2%	−30%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	−8%	−16%	−17%	−15%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	26,016	81,014	95,110	6,062	15.7	274	6.39	100%
2024	Maersk A/S	25,529	79,458	87,119	5,543	15.7	293	5.27	99%
2023	not published	12,870	40,091	43,687	2,968	14.7	295	5.07	97%
2022	not published	4,725	14,752	16,044	1,874	8.6	295	6.34	94%
2021	not published	2,643	8,288	9,024	823	11.0	293	6.99	–
2020	not published	14,042	43,726	43,773	2,784	15.7	321	6.11	100%
2019	not published	18,610	57,969	62,200	3,773	16.5	299	5.63	100%
2018	not published	24,440	76,226	74,996	4,148	18.1	326	6.62	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.39	16.3	−61%	104 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	5.27	17.5	−70%	20 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	5.07	19.4	−74%	11 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.34	19.1	−67%	64 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	6.99	17.9	−61%	144 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.11	17.6	−65%	77 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.63	18.9	−70%	21 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.62	20.2	−67%	31 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.