Navalyze · Container · Ship

MANILA MAERSK

IMO: 9780469
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 138,346 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 159,521 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

310

Container median 165 kg/nm (+88%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.05

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−69%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,400 t

CO₂ emitted

57,309 t

Distance sailed

59,381 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,983 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 276 kg/nm · median 177 (+56%)

78.8Ranks 1,839 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 89% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−62%)

7.22Ranks 84 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU44%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

18,161 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

768 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MANILA MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MANILA MAERSK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MANILA MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−13%	−16%	+3%	+10%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	+2%	+13%	+52%	−6%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.7 kn	+11%	+47%	+79%	+11%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.4 kn	−5%	−32%	−44%	+0%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+43%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	+0%	−6%	−33%	−5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−6%	−13%	+70%	−8%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	25,661	79,909	92,862	5,825	15.9	276	6.22	100%
2024	Maersk A/S	28,608	89,042	90,144	5,468	16.5	317	5.67	99%
2023	not published	18,400	57,309	59,381	3,983	14.9	310	6.05	99%
2022	not published	9,264	28,854	33,146	2,947	11.2	280	5.46	96%
2021	not published	17,348	54,034	59,135	3,780	15.6	293	5.45	–
2020	not published	12,189	37,959	41,343	2,689	15.4	295	5.10	100%
2019	not published	18,284	56,942	62,064	3,789	16.4	295	5.39	100%
2018	not published	11,433	35,694	36,425	2,072	17.6	314	5.89	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.22	16.3	−62%	84 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	5.67	17.5	−68%	41 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.05	19.4	−69%	63 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	5.46	19.1	−71%	15 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	5.45	17.9	−70%	18 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.10	17.6	−71%	11 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.39	18.9	−71%	13 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	5.89	20.2	−71%	7 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.