Navalyze · Container · Ship

MUMBAI MAERSK

IMO: 9780471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 151,541 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 154,095 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Container median 178 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.31

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−67%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

114.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,614 t

CO₂ emitted

51,761 t

Distance sailed

53,233 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,488 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 315 kg/nm · median 177 (+78%)

78.8Ranks 2,049 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)

9.1Faster than 97% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−60%)

7.22Ranks 115 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU24%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

15,983 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,988 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MUMBAI MAERSK
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MUMBAI MAERSK
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MUMBAI MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+0%	+1%	−39%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	−4%	+12%	+116%	−5%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+4%	−1%	−22%	−3%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−7%	−12%	+17%	+23%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+8%	+8%	+22%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	−32%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−9%	−13%	+25%	−17%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	17,238	53,658	54,727	3,249	16.8	315	6.47	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	28,218	87,800	89,933	5,366	16.8	314	5.83	99%
2023	not published	13,588	42,320	41,692	2,897	14.4	326	6.11	98%
2022	not published	16,614	51,761	53,233	3,488	15.3	312	6.31	96%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15,278	44,529	45,454	2,819	16.1	336	5.11	–
2020	not published	11,526	35,892	37,106	2,286	16.2	311	5.15	100%
2019	not published	16,550	51,550	54,675	3,388	16.1	303	5.28	100%
2018	not published	14,520	45,311	43,756	2,585	16.9	332	6.36	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.47	16.3	−60%	115 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	5.83	17.5	−67%	53 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.11	19.4	−69%	70 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	6.31	19.1	−67%	60 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5.11	17.9	−71%	5 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.15	17.6	−71%	13 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.28	18.9	−72%	11 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.36	20.2	−69%	17 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.