Navalyze · Cruise · Ship

AIDANOVA

IMO: 9781865
Type: Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship)
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genoa
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Costa Crociere S.p.A. · part of Carnival Corporation

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

444

Passenger median 277 kg/nm (+60%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

213

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (−64%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

Passenger median 12.9 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

126.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,985 t

CO₂ emitted

69,422 t

Distance sailed

56,285 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,729 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the cruise fleet, 2025

Set against all 202 cruise ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 335 kg/nm · median 264 (+27%)

89.6Ranks 136 of 202, lowest first416

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.1 (−6%)

10.8Faster than 32% of cruise ships15.5

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 144 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 521 (−72%)

303Ranks 1 of 202, lowest first1,701

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Cruise medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU28%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

19,341 t

27.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Cruise median is the middle ship of all cruise ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AIDANOVA
Cruise median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AIDANOVA
Cruise median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

AIDANOVA
Cruise median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−11%	−13%	+3%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−7%	+4%	+14%	−18%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	+5%	−46%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.8 kn	−81%	−72%	+1,012%	−93%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 81%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+4.3 kn	+116%	+424%	−49%	+9,935%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 116%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−8.8 kn	+148%	−36%	−82%	−76%	8.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 148%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+5.9 kn	−18%	+64%	+2,261%	−53%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Costa Crociere S.p.A.	24,042	65,041	71,878	5,827	12.3	335	–	–
2024LNG	Costa Crociere S.p.A.	26,157	71,843	69,498	5,512	12.6	376	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	24,819	72,199	61,213	5,451	11.2	405	–	–
2022	not published	26,192	81,867	58,577	5,246	11.2	447	–	–
2021	not published	12,504	37,340	5,266	708	7.4	2,375	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11,293	32,243	10,262	3,351	3.1	1,101	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	24,985	69,422	56,285	4,729	11.9	444	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1,284	3,557	2,384	400	6.0	539	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Cruise median	vs Cruise	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Costa Crociere S.p.A.	144	521	−72%	1 of 202	DNV	B
2024LNG	Costa Crociere S.p.A.	167	618	−73%	3 of 202	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	203	625	−68%	8 of 202	DNV	B
2022	not published	377	831	−55%	10 of 187	RINA	A
2021	not published	5,166	1,315	+293%	93 of 100	RINA	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	51.5	1,169	−96%	3 of 100	RINA	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	213	589	−64%	1 of 177	RINA	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	456	577	−21%	48 of 153	RINA	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Cruise ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's cruise ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.