Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK HONG KONG

IMO: 9784257
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 103,262 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.39 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 103,262 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

251.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.62

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−53%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,403 t

CO₂ emitted

48,105 t

48,861 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,135 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,774 h

157 days, 43% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 251.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+42%)

78.8Ranks 1,669 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.2 kn · median 13.3 (+22%)

9.1Faster than 92% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.62 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 283 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU39%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU1%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (25,214 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

0.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.8 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAERSK HONG KONG
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK HONG KONG
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK HONG KONG
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−26%	+12%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+5.9 kn	+21%	+89%	+423%	−10%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	+4%	+22%	+44%	+3%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.5 kn	−22%	−48%	−12%	−17%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+8%	+3%	−19%	+1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	+27%	+11%	−57%	+55%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−28%	−28%	−46%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	15,403	48,105	61,135	3,774	16.2	251.9	7.62	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	21,031	65,505	82,474	5,005	16.5	255.0	6.79	99%
2023	not published	3,325	10,379	15,771	1,490	10.6	210.8	7.56	94%
2022	not published	2,231	6,972	10,958	1,222	9.0	203.6	7.37	91%
2021	not published	3,236	10,101	12,434	918	13.5	260.2	8.92	–
2020	not published	3,702	11,553	15,353	1,078	14.2	241.1	8.81	100%
2019	not published	6,861	21,380	36,109	2,219	16.3	190.0	5.67	100%
2018	not published	17,598	54,866	66,323	4,089	16.2	265.3	7.07	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	7.62	16.30	−53%	283 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	6.79	17.52	−61%	134 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.56	19.40	−61%	207 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.37	19.13	−61%	177 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.92	17.90	−50%	237 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.81	17.58	−50%	291 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.67	18.88	−70%	21 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.07	20.22	−65%	63 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.