Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK HANOI

IMO: 9784295
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 126,064 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 120,964 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

258

Container median 174 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−65%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,123 t

CO₂ emitted

34,643 t

Distance sailed

43,131 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,704 h

113 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 259 kg/nm · median 177 (+46%)

78.8Ranks 1,724 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 13.3 (+23%)

9.1Faster than 93% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−61%)

7.22Ranks 104 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU46%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

11,123 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

890 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK HANOI
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK HANOI
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK HANOI
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+4%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+7.2 kn	+16%	+108%	+908%	−2%	7.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−3%	+6%	−30%	−7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.7 kn	−10%	−47%	+6%	−6%	5.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+9%	+9%	−21%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.9 kn	−10%	−20%	−64%	+27%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+3%	+1%	−24%	+9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	24,194	75,307	93,485	5,742	16.3	259	6.39	100%
2024	Maersk A/S	23,043	71,776	90,256	5,531	16.3	255	7.07	99%
2023	not published	1,979	6,191	8,955	989	9.1	221	7.18	90%
2022	not published	2,911	9,097	12,812	1,541	8.3	227	7.70	92%
2021	not published	3,063	9,560	12,066	860	14.0	254	8.17	–
2020	not published	3,558	11,102	15,333	1,088	14.1	232	8.42	100%
2019	not published	11,123	34,643	43,131	2,704	16.0	258	6.64	100%
2018	not published	14,278	44,523	56,946	3,496	16.3	251	6.09	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	6.39	16.3	−61%	104 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	7.07	17.5	−60%	160 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.18	19.4	−63%	173 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	7.70	19.1	−60%	199 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	8.17	17.9	−54%	194 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	8.42	17.6	−52%	257 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	6.64	18.9	−65%	89 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.09	20.2	−70%	10 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.