Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BW PAVILION ARANDA

IMO: 9792606
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

209

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.72

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−26%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,351 t

CO₂ emitted

43,198 t

Distance sailed

73,603 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,433 h

226 days, 62% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 218 kg/nm · median 190 (+14%)

152Ranks 263 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.4 (−22%)

11.2Faster than 10% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.64 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+21%)

5.06Ranks 251 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU45%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

911 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BW PAVILION ARANDA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BW PAVILION ARANDA
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BW PAVILION ARANDA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+15%	−0%	−80%	+27%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.1 kn	−8%	−21%	+134%	+8%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−1%	+10%	−57%	−19%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+7%	+12%	+651%	+18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+7%	−5%	−76%	+4%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.0 kn	−60%	−32%	+164%	−73%	6.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 60%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	3,153	8,853	14,468	1,290	11.2	218	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	13,971	39,206	73,485	5,694	12.9	190	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6,506	18,116	31,389	2,089	15.0	207	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	15,351	43,198	73,603	5,433	13.5	209	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	1,904	5,319	9,799	752	13.0	194	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,510	21,050	41,494	2,806	14.8	181	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7,117	19,930	15,719	1,796	8.8	453	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	8.64	7.12	+21%	251 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	6.78	7.39	−8%	138 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.25	9.10	−31%	71 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.72	10.4	−26%	121 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	6.52	10.5	−38%	50 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6.29	10.7	−41%	15 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	23.6	10.9	+117%	227 of 248	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.