Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

PGC EIRINI

IMO
9800178
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
1,906 t
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 13.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Paradise Navigation SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,906 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
43.4 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−47%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
72.66
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+104%)
Average speed
11.2 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−11%)
Fuel per day at sea
11.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,889 t
CO₂ emitted
6,024 t
6,117 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
43,502 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,888 h
162 days, 44% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 43.4 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−47%)
49.8Ranks 15 of 355, lowest first124.4
Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 12.6 (−11%)
8.8Faster than 28% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 72.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+104%)
14.36Ranks 263 of 355, lowest first120.18
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports88%
  • From the EU2%
  • Into the EU2%
  • At berth in the EU8%

97% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,851 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • PGC EIRINI
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • PGC EIRINI
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • PGC EIRINI
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.0 kn+9%+1%−12%+18%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+4.2 kn−25%+14%+65%−5%4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+3.9 kn−58%−17%+129%−24%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 58%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−7.3 kn+214%+12%−70%−21%7.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 214%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+3.9 kn−24%+15%+16%+39%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.3 kn−3%+39%+8%−47%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−4.2 kn+50%−16%+5%+136%4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Paradise Navigation SA1,8896,02443,5023,88811.243.472.66–
2024Paradise Navigation SA1,9726,19849,5024,06612.239.861.32–
2023not published1,5975,03030,0673,7718.053.164.51–
2022not published1,6555,24513,1403,2344.1126.084.82–
2021not published1,7375,48643,2913,79011.440.1107.91–
2020not published1,9746,25537,1934,9377.553.177.89–
2019not published1,8735,92034,3276,5635.254.6147.55–
2018not published1,1823,71432,5533,4709.436.362.42–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025Paradise Navigation SA72.6635.56+104%263 of 355Bureau VeritasA
2024Paradise Navigation SA61.3235.82+71%208 of 306Bureau VeritasA
2023not published64.5141.77+54%216 of 330Bureau VeritasA
2022not published84.8242.53+99%267 of 348Bureau VeritasA
2021not published107.9146.91+130%276 of 323Bureau VeritasA
2020not published77.8942.29+84%251 of 339Bureau VeritasA
2019not published147.5545.85+222%308 of 331Bureau VeritasA
2018not published62.4253.11+18%166 of 297Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.