Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ATLANTIC AFFINITY

IMO: 9803352
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LIVIA ROSE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Union Marine Mgmt Serv Pte Ltd

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,555 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.2

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.56

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−46%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+22%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,980 t

CO₂ emitted

12,432 t

Distance sailed

50,909 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,029 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.8 kg/nm · median 86.1 (−2%)

63.6Ranks 1,675 of 3,548, lowest first125

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 10.8 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 71% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (−41%)

4.85Ranks 355 of 3,548, lowest first17.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU34%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

635 t

5.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ATLANTIC AFFINITY
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ATLANTIC AFFINITY
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ATLANTIC AFFINITY
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+2%	−6%	−78%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−4%	+3%	−25%	−57%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−16%	−28%	+53%	+57%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+22%	+23%	−65%	+42%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+11%	+6%	−23%	+11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−9%	+4%	+70%	−25%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	Union Marine Mgmt Serv Pte Ltd	305	956	3,527	339	10.4	86.4	–	–
2024	HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd	305	956	3,527	339	10.4	86.4	–	–
2023	not published	1,334	4,194	15,725	1,386	11.3	84.8	4.85	–
2022	not published	1,845	5,832	20,884	1,973	10.6	88.3	11.3	–
2021	not published	1,430	4,526	13,606	1,111	12.2	105	7.20	–
2020	not published	3,371	10,681	38,947	3,216	12.1	86.5	5.08	–
2019	not published	3,980	12,432	50,909	4,029	12.6	78.2	4.56	–
2018	not published	2,576	8,048	30,011	2,713	11.1	85.8	6.10	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	Union Marine Mgmt Serv Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	HMM Ocean Service Co Ltd	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	4.85	8.27	−41%	355 of 3,548	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	11.3	8.71	+30%	2,861 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	7.20	8.57	−16%	1,099 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	5.08	8.24	−38%	299 of 3,150	DNV	C
2019	not published	4.56	8.38	−46%	259 of 3,360	DNV	C
2018	not published	6.10	8.50	−28%	684 of 3,384	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.