Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA ESTRID

IMO: 9807293
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Ltd · part of Stena

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

186

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,333

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+78%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

177

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−19%)

Average speed

17.5 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,212 t

CO₂ emitted

41,347 t

Distance sailed

71,094 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,065 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 172 kg/nm · median 150 (+14%)

69.3Ranks 273 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 15.8 (−2%)

12.0Faster than 45% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 695 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+23%)

66.8Ranks 231 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 235 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−7%)

48.6Ranks 195 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5,247 t

12.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA ESTRID
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA ESTRID
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.017.5

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA ESTRID
Ro-pax median

175200225250275

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA ESTRID
Ro-pax median

4006008001,0001,2001,400

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	+2%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+1%	+0%	−9%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+2%	+3%	−6%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+2%	−2%	−9%	−43%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−12%	−17%	+23%	−11%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Ltd	11,994	37,469	69,785	4,507	15.5	172	–	–
2024part-year	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	11,047	34,502	64,151	3,991	16.1	172	–	–
2024	Stena Line Ltd	11,702	36,548	68,427	4,283	16.0	171	–	–
2023	not published	12,773	39,919	75,216	4,691	16.0	170	–	–
2022	not published	13,302	41,578	79,759	5,051	15.8	167	–	–
2021	not published	14,289	44,799	87,622	5,323	16.5	163	–	–
2020	not published	13,212	41,347	71,094	4,065	17.5	186	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Ltd	695	567	+23%	231 of 408	235	253	−7%	DNV	C
2024part-year	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Ltd	599	547	+10%	214 of 404	215	233	−8%	DNV	C
2023	not published	643	680	−5%	185 of 386	219	234	−6%	DNV	C
2022	not published	672	626	+7%	205 of 394	264	253	+4%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,188	815	+46%	264 of 377	202	226	−11%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,333	751	+78%	269 of 387	177	217	−19%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.