Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ULUSOY-16

IMO: 9809095
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 5,474 t
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEDI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GARDENIA SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ulusoy Ro/Ro Isletmeleri · part of Ulusoy

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,474 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

95.0 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.07

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−43%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,429 t

CO₂ emitted

29,376 t

29,839 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

99,249 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,288 h

262 days, 72% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.0 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−9%)

56.6Ranks 86 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

10.9Faster than 71% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 54.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−43%)

47.35Ranks 39 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,838 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ULUSOY-16
Ro-ro median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ULUSOY-16
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ULUSOY-16
Ro-ro median

50.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−0%	+0%	−0%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	−1%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−18%	−16%	+59%	−39%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−8%	−10%	−2%	−32%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−8%	−7%	−1%	+54%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+7%	+4%	+6%	+10%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	−0%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Ulusoy Ro/Ro Isletmeleri	9,429	29,376	99,249	6,288	15.8	95.0	54.07	–
2024	Ulusoy Ro/Ro Isletmeleri	9,480	29,533	99,368	6,329	15.7	95.4	54.34	–
2023	not published	10,242	31,917	100,733	6,239	16.1	101.7	56.13	5%
2022	not published	7,835	24,415	63,506	4,008	15.8	123.4	92.15	95%
2021	not published	8,701	27,423	64,822	4,023	16.1	134.2	135.47	–
2020	not published	9,542	29,731	65,616	4,082	16.1	145.4	87.83	–
2019	not published	8,397	26,166	61,690	3,718	16.6	136.1	80.09	–
2018	not published	8,628	26,890	61,715	3,723	16.6	139.8	84.01	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ulusoy Ro/Ro Isletmeleri	54.07	95.19	−43%	39 of 235	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	Ulusoy Ro/Ro Isletmeleri	54.34	97.53	−44%	28 of 220	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	56.13	108.62	−48%	30 of 221	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2022	not published	92.15	90.62	+2%	113 of 223	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2021	not published	135.47	103.64	+31%	147 of 219	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	87.83	102.77	−15%	89 of 238	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	80.09	90.89	−12%	102 of 271	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	84.01	91.03	−8%	109 of 260	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.