Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ENERGY TRIUMPH

IMO: 9817614
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 101,100 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Enterprises Shipping & Trading

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 68,528 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

149

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.80

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (−19%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,833 t

CO₂ emitted

12,026 t

Distance sailed

25,808 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,333 h

97 days, 27% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 132 kg/nm · median 129 (+3%)

76.1Ranks 916 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)

8.0Faster than 71% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−49%)

4.51Ranks 102 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU33%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU15%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,785 t

14.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGY TRIUMPH
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGY TRIUMPH
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ENERGY TRIUMPH
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−8%	−4%	−61%	−35%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+97%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−4%	−5%	+15%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−9%	−12%	+25%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+9%	+8%	+131%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+45%	+46%	−27%	+156%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−35%	−24%	−42%	−57%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	2,639	8,245	19,940	1,749	11.4	132	4.09	68%
2024	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	7,295	22,828	50,816	4,638	11.0	144	6.28	61%
2023	not published	3,833	12,026	25,808	2,333	11.1	149	6.80	–
2022	not published	3,479	10,988	22,486	2,018	11.1	155	5.99	–
2021	not published	3,032	9,493	17,924	1,550	11.6	169	6.30	–
2020	not published	1,198	3,752	7,748	662	11.7	155	6.76	–
2019	not published	1,132	3,535	10,592	916	11.6	107	2.64	–
2018	not published	3,039	9,555	18,360	1,868	9.8	166	6.08	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	4.09	7.95	−49%	102 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Enterprises Shipping & Trading	6.28	8.06	−22%	524 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	6.80	8.44	−19%	602 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	5.99	8.51	−30%	453 of 1,961	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	6.30	8.86	−29%	465 of 1,789	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	6.76	9.03	−25%	518 of 1,870	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	2.64	8.83	−70%	59 of 1,919	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	6.08	8.86	−31%	436 of 1,779	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.