Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BOW OPTIMA

IMO
9818541
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Bergen
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.46 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Odfjell Management AS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
117.2 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
13.1 kn
Fuel per day at sea
36.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
681 t
CO₂ emitted
2,140 t
2,173 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
5,815 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
444 h
19 days, 5% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 109.7 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+36%)
53.8Ranks 1,136 of 1,274, lowest first110.8
Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 11.0 (+16%)
8.7Faster than 96% of chemical tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (−47%)
8.47Ranks 159 of 1,274, lowest first41.97
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU95%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU5%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,240 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • BOW OPTIMA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • BOW OPTIMA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BOW OPTIMA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.3 kn+7%+9%−57%–Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.9 kn−2%−8%+55%−10%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.2 kn+11%+33%−75%−17%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.2 kn−11%−12%+100%+11%Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.2 kn−5%−6%−21%−4%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Odfjell Management AS6812,1405,81544413.1117.2––
2024Odfjell Management AS1,4784,61213,4731,05012.8109.78.86–
2023not published9733,0908,71863813.7111.79.86–
2022not published3,46310,96134,5763,01611.5100.211.93–
2021not published1,9346,13317,2491,47211.7112.210.76–
2020not published2,5578,08521,7671,83611.9117.511.22–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Odfjell Management AS––––DNVB+C
2024Odfjell Management AS8.8616.73−47%159 of 1,274DNVB+C
2023not published9.8616.23−39%197 of 1,314DNVB+C
2022not published11.9316.06−26%393 of 1,409DNVB
2021not published10.7616.69−36%240 of 1,343DNVB
2020not published11.2216.16−31%265 of 1,312DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

BOW OPTIMA (IMO 9818541): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2025 | Navalyze