Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARKLOW WIND

IMO: 9818943
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 9,721 t
Port of registry: Arklow
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.44 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arklow Shipping ULC · part of Arklow

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,721 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

49.9 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

16.25

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−36%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,689 t

CO₂ emitted

5,350 t

5,433 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,869 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,151 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 49.9 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+41%)

17.4Ranks 1,867 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 9.3 (+15%)

7.0Faster than 76% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 16.25 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−36%)

10.14Ranks 528 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU8%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU7%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,939 t).

Fuel burned laden

57%

43% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ARKLOW WIND
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARKLOW WIND
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ARKLOW WIND
General cargo median

15.017.520.022.525.027.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−1%	−1%	−16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−9%	+7%	+13%	+20%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+6%	−3%	−5%	−13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	−31%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+4%	+5%	+16%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−5%	+15%	+9%	+12%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	1,689	5,350	33,869	3,151	10.7	49.9	16.25	57%
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	1,673	5,292	34,273	3,085	11.1	48.8	19.33	–
2023	not published	1,622	5,118	30,261	3,180	9.5	53.6	16.17	–
2022	not published	1,607	5,109	31,912	3,068	10.4	50.4	18.58	–
2021	not published	2,330	7,375	46,115	4,316	10.7	50.5	17.03	–
2020	not published	1,928	6,092	39,851	3,721	10.7	48.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,859	5,844	36,632	4,119	8.9	50.8	16.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	16.25	25.45	−36%	528 of 2,706	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	19.34	19.25	+0%	565 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	16.18	20.67	−22%	356 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	18.58	21.57	−14%	379 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	17.03	22.70	−25%	296 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	18.12	24.50	−26%	280 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	16.24	24.96	−35%	216 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.