Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

LILY PG

IMO: 9823390
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 2,221 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEDI 14.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,944 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

36.5

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+262%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,766 t

CO₂ emitted

5,518 t

Distance sailed

48,364 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,425 h

184 days, 51% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 36.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−54%)

52.8Ranks 12 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 44% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+242%)

7.93Ranks 1,391 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU56%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

1,754 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

41 t

0.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LILY PG
Chemical tanker median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LILY PG
Chemical tanker median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LILY PG
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	+2%	−9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−5%	+1%	−1%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+6%	−4%	−20%	−11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−7%	−3%	+42%	+20%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+10%	+14%	−23%	+998%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−4%	−2%	−25%	−81%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd	1,793	5,626	49,171	4,512	10.9	36.5	51.5	–
2024	Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd	1,657	5,184	47,998	4,106	11.7	34.5	56.6	99%
2023	not published	1,766	5,518	48,364	4,425	10.9	36.5	58.7	99%
2022	not published	2,086	6,520	60,557	4,996	12.1	34.4	66.1	–
2021	not published	1,584	4,954	42,767	3,677	11.6	37.0	55.2	–
2020	not published	1,855	5,795	55,309	4,971	11.1	33.5	5.03	–
2019	not published	2,550	7,950	73,282	6,662	11.0	34.8	26.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd	51.5	15.0	+242%	1,391 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd	56.6	16.7	+239%	1,226 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	58.7	16.2	+262%	1,265 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	66.1	16.1	+311%	1,381 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	55.2	16.7	+231%	1,287 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	5.03	16.2	−69%	3 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	26.2	17.3	+51%	978 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.