Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd
Ships8
CO₂ emitted13 kt+49.9%
Fuel per mile44 kg/nm
Average speed9.3 kn
CO₂ at berth5.4%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd62.3 (+684%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd662.3+684%557.88789.2%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd52.4 (+249%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd252.4+249%3710.52,6541.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers LtdLloyd's Register (8)0%100%0%0%

Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
GEORGINA PG9415741Oil tanker66.3 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+144%10.6239 t€7k
EVIE PG9396359Oil tanker64.0 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+136%5.62,858 t€78k
HENRIETTA PG9238442Oil tanker62.3 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+130%9.9166 t€3k
LETTIE PG1018846Oil tanker53.1 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+96%9.7777 t€21k
COSIMA PG9857822Chemical tanker53.3 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+36%8.0877 t€25k
LILY PG9823390Chemical tanker51.5 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+31%10.95,626 t€149k
AGNES PG1018858Oil tanker20.0 g CO₂/t·nm27.1−26%11.21,907 t€50k

30 of 8 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.