Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd
Ships5
CO₂ emitted8,902 t
Fuel per mile40 kg/nm
Average speed10.4 kn
CO₂ at berth5.8%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd62.2 (+272%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd362.2+272%3610.91,7102.5%–
Segment median 16.70%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd54.8 (+580%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd254.8+580%568.61,60314.0%–
Segment median 8.10%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Pritchard-Gordon Tankers LtdLloyd's Register (5)0%100%0%0%

Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ROSE PG9799032Chemical tanker96.4 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+134%7.3714 t€11k
EVIE PG9396359Oil tanker54.8 g CO₂/t·nm25.2+117%8.62,425 t€29k
COSIMA PG9857822Chemical tanker62.2 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+51%8.5455 t€7k
LILY PG9823390Chemical tanker56.6 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+37%11.75,184 t€78k

30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.