Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SUNRISE RAY

IMO: 9829679
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,471 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BW RADON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,471 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

61.2 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−12%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,359 t

CO₂ emitted

7,410 t

7,526 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,560 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,566 h

149 days, 41% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−23%)

52.8Ranks 279 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 11.1 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 41% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−12%)

7.93Ranks 607 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU39%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU10%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,435 t).

Fuel burned laden

85%

15% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

9.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SUNRISE RAY
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUNRISE RAY
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUNRISE RAY
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+10%	+1%	−9%	+3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+44%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−1%	+0%	−27%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−3%	−6%	+11%	−17%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−1%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	+10%	+53%	+137%	+0%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	−20%	−31%	+16%	−29%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	2,359	7,410	38,560	3,566	10.8	61.2	13.28	85%
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	2,362	7,441	42,447	3,597	11.8	55.6	12.85	78%
2023	not published	1,701	5,363	29,541	2,502	11.8	57.6	12.73	90%
2022	not published	2,361	7,465	40,514	3,480	11.6	58.3	11.98	87%
2021	not published	2,207	6,991	36,524	3,037	12.0	60.4	14.42	87%
2020	not published	2,237	7,096	36,794	3,010	12.2	60.8	14.12	–
2019	not published	859	2,687	15,517	1,772	8.8	55.3	14.12	81%
2018	not published	926	2,904	13,369	1,322	10.1	69.3	19.86	81%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	13.28	15.04	−12%	607 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	12.85	16.73	−23%	445 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	12.73	16.23	−22%	406 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.98	16.06	−25%	399 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	14.42	16.69	−14%	522 of 1,343	ABS	A
2020	not published	14.12	16.16	−13%	500 of 1,312	ABS	A
2019	not published	14.12	17.32	−18%	453 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	19.86	17.14	+16%	792 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.