Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM RIVOLI

IMO
9839193
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
145,440 t
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 145,440 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
303.7 kg/nm
Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+72%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
5.73
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−65%)
Average speed
16.0 kn
Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)
Fuel per day at sea
116.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
26,145 t
CO₂ emitted
71,752 t
85,346 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
86,099 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,367 h
224 days, 61% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 303.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+72%)
78.8Ranks 1,992 of 2,208, lowest first302.4
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)
9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.73 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−65%)
7.22Ranks 38 of 2,208, lowest first46.89
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU36%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU3%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (38,914 t).

Fuel burned laden
97%
3% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
457.1 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.189
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CMA CGM RIVOLI
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM RIVOLI
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM RIVOLI
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.4 kn−23%−29%+14%−26%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+4.1 kn+31%+72%+121%+33%4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.2 kn−23%−29%−48%−17%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn+14%+9%+5%+65%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGCMA SHIPS SAS26,14571,75286,0995,36716.0303.75.7397%
2024CMA SHIPS SAS29,87692,78575,4384,33017.4396.07.7098%
2023LNGnot published10,30929,40134,0802,57013.3302.55.7989%
2022LNGnot published25,53672,78265,0654,48914.5392.56.9694%
2021LNGnot published21,24262,40461,8084,08815.1343.74.2195%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGCMA SHIPS SAS5.7316.30−65%38 of 2,208ABSC
2024CMA SHIPS SAS7.7017.52−56%237 of 1,974ABSC
2023LNGnot published5.7919.40−70%36 of 1,899ABSC
2022LNGnot published6.9619.13−64%135 of 1,825ABSA
2021LNGnot published4.2117.90−76%2 of 1,781ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.