Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BW MAGNOLIA

IMO: 9850666
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

190

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.13

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−11%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,390 t

CO₂ emitted

35,292 t

Distance sailed

65,206 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,852 h

202 days, 55% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 190 (−7%)

152Ranks 132 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

11.2Faster than 56% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 4.81 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−32%)

5.06Ranks 23 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU55%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

551 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BW MAGNOLIA
LNG carrier median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BW MAGNOLIA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BW MAGNOLIA
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−6%	−11%	+48%	−59%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	−1%	+15%	−72%	+44%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+0%	−6%	−9%	+12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	4,863	13,465	27,335	1,860	14.7	178	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	3,483	9,716	18,464	1,183	15.6	189	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,390	35,292	65,206	4,852	13.4	190	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13,526	38,760	71,310	5,002	14.3	190	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	4.81	7.12	−32%	23 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	11.7	7.39	+59%	251 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.13	9.10	−11%	153 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7.28	10.4	−30%	99 of 379	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.