Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

COSIMA PG

IMO
9857822
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
2,584 t
Technical efficiency
EEDI 13.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,584 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
43.0 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−46%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
53.32
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+255%)
Average speed
8.0 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−28%)
Fuel per day at sea
8.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
274 t
CO₂ emitted
877 t
891 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
6,368 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
796 h
33 days, 9% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 43.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−46%)
52.8Ranks 37 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 11.1 (−28%)
8.8Faster than 7% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+255%)
7.93Ranks 1,402 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU7%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (469 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • COSIMA PG
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • COSIMA PG
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COSIMA PG
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn+7%+1%+80%−14%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn−3%−15%+596%+5%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023−0.2 kn+5%+3%+76%–Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.7 kn+30%+39%−86%–0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd2748776,3687968.043.053.32–
2024Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd1424553,5354188.540.162.19–
2023not published2168508539.641.559.3896%
2021not published1137288299.839.6312.90–
2020not published632032,0712279.130.55.24–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd53.3215.04+255%1,402 of 1,460Lloyd's RegisterB
2024Pritchard-Gordon Tankers Ltd62.1916.73+272%1,237 of 1,274Lloyd's RegisterB
2023not published59.3816.23+266%1,268 of 1,314Lloyd's RegisterB
2021not published––––Lloyd's RegisterB
2020not published5.2416.16−68%5 of 1,312Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

COSIMA PG (IMO 9857822): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2025 | Navalyze