Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG GEORGETOWN

IMO
9864916
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bermuda
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
177
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−23%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.98
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−34%)
Average speed
15.3 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
64.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,894 t
CO₂ emitted
21,961 t
Distance sailed
44,613 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,919 h
122 days, 33% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 177 kg/nm · median 231 (−23%)
167Ranks 53 of 355, lowest first359
Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.2 (+8%)
10.7Faster than 78% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.98 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−34%)
5.47Ranks 56 of 355, lowest first17.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU52%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
316 t
1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • GASLOG GEORGETOWN
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • GASLOG GEORGETOWN
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • GASLOG GEORGETOWN
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024−4.1 kn+9%−20%−76%–4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.1 kn−6%+9%+35%−10%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.9 kn−2%−8%−9%−1%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.2,0405,60510,59094711.2193––
2023LNG / alt.not published7,89421,96144,6132,91915.3177––
2022LNG / alt.not published6,20917,56232,9942,49613.2188–46%
2021LNG / alt.not published6,92419,68636,2312,57314.1191–39%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024LNGGasLog LNG Services Ltd.––––ABSB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published5.989.10−34%56 of 355ABSB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published6.6810.4−36%72 of 379ABSB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published6.7410.5−36%55 of 289ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.