Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EVA USUKI

IMO: 9865532
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,384 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.26 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,630 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.7

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+5%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,207 t

CO₂ emitted

3,800 t

Distance sailed

15,948 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,179 h

49 days, 13% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−4%)

52.8Ranks 634 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 7.1 kn · median 11.1 (−36%)

8.8Faster than 4% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−2%)

7.93Ranks 705 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports34%
From the EU16%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU23%

Fuel burned laden

910 t

75% of all fuel; 25% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

877 t

23.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVA USUKI
Chemical tanker median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVA USUKI
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVA USUKI
Chemical tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.5 kn	+8%	−20%	−16%	+12%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.7 kn	−78%	−70%	+2,970%	−86%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 78%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.0 kn	+385%	+243%	−98%	+412%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 385%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−11%	−35%	+44%	+6%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	−32%	−39%	+293%	−49%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,116	3,515	14,623	2,056	7.1	76.3	14.7	88%
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,223	3,842	17,344	1,800	9.6	70.5	13.1	91%
2023	not published	185	592	565	81	6.9	327	94.9	33%
2022	not published	1,549	4,847	22,989	2,331	9.9	67.4	18.5	82%
2021	not published	1,207	3,800	15,948	1,179	13.5	75.7	17.5	75%
2020	not published	454	1,423	4,053	272	14.9	112	34.5	57%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	14.7	15.0	−2%	705 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	13.1	16.7	−21%	460 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	94.9	16.2	+485%	1,311 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	18.5	16.1	+15%	816 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	17.5	16.7	+5%	731 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	34.5	16.2	+114%	1,107 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.