Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

DIAMOND GAS CRYSTAL

IMO
9874454
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 5.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
182
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (−21%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
7.33
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−19%)
Average speed
14.5 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
63.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,273 t
CO₂ emitted
28,728 t
Distance sailed
56,543 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,911 h
163 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 190 (−7%)
152Ranks 129 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 14.4 (−11%)
11.2Faster than 20% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.62 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+21%)
5.06Ranks 250 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU55%
  • Into the EU42%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
735 t
2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • DIAMOND GAS CRYSTAL
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • DIAMOND GAS CRYSTAL
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • DIAMOND GAS CRYSTAL
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.9 kn+8%+1%−64%+25%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.8 kn−10%−14%+25%−6%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+2.1 kn+7%+25%+127%+9%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD4,44512,07925,0511,95612.8178––
2024part-yearLNGNYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd5,10813,84830,5642,10014.6167––
2024LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD11,58131,41270,5365,13713.7164––
2023LNG / alt.not published10,27328,72856,5433,91114.5182––
2022LNG / alt.not published4,25811,90424,9582,01812.4171––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD8.627.12+21%250 of 386ClassNKB+C
2024part-yearLNGNYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd––––ClassNKC
2024LNGNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD6.927.39−6%141 of 312ClassNKB+C
2023LNG / alt.not published7.339.10−19%125 of 355ClassNKA+C
2022LNG / alt.not published6.7310.4−35%77 of 379ClassNKA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.