Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ROSENROT

IMO: 9877133
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

262

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

8.66

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−5%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

75.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,490 t

CO₂ emitted

56,111 t

Distance sailed

81,949 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,875 h

286 days, 78% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 198 kg/nm · median 190 (+4%)

152Ranks 221 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.4 (−9%)

11.2Faster than 23% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.26 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+16%)

5.06Ranks 237 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

819 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ROSENROT
LNG carrier median

180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0280.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ROSENROT
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ROSENROT
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	−11%	−27%	+56%	+30%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.1 kn	−16%	+14%	−36%	−27%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	+12%	−10%	+4%	−11%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−5%	−13%	+373%	+29%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	16,333	44,929	82,559	6,303	13.1	198	–	–
2024part-yearLNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	9,838	23,480	44,704	2,783	16.1	220	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	11,689	27,437	52,831	3,294	16.0	221	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	21,490	56,111	81,949	6,875	11.9	262	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	18,481	53,627	78,634	5,323	14.8	235	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4,133	11,591	16,631	1,042	16.0	249	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	8.26	7.12	+16%	237 of 386	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024part-yearLNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2024LNG	MOL LNG SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	6.34	7.39	−14%	120 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.66	9.10	−5%	167 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9.74	10.4	−6%	174 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7.53	10.5	−28%	77 of 289	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.