Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING HARMONY

IMO: 9881665
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

–

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

–

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

–

Fuel per day at sea

–

Fuel consumed

0 t

CO₂ emitted

0 t

0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

–

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

0 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,034 general cargo ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.1 kg/nm · median 57.3 (+55%)

36.2Ranks 882 of 1,034, lowest first96.6

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 10.8 (+21%)

8.0Faster than 92% of general cargo ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 4.53 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 21.57 (−79%)

9.00Ranks 13 of 1,034, lowest first43.69

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

–

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING HARMONY
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING HARMONY
General cargo median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

COSCO SHIPPING HARMONY
General cargo median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	−14%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	1,026	3,226	11,513	881	13.1	89.1	9.72	–
2021	not published	1,227	3,840	13,420	1,068	12.6	91.5	6.06	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	4.53	21.57	−79%	13 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	4.62	22.70	−80%	11 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.