Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTDyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 43 |
| CO₂ emitted | 102 kt+111.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 83 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | General cargo |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD9.5 (−63% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD | 36 | 9.5 | −63% | 86 | 12.3 | 1,246 | 3.2% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD8.0 (+1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD | 7 | 8.0 | +1% | 74 | 12.1 | 1,797 | 3.8% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD | China Classification Society (43) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
TIAN JIN COSBULK SHIP MANAGEMENT CO.,LTD: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHUN FU | 9998107 | General cargo | 34.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +36% | 13.5 | 3,768 t | €102k |
| RUI FU | 9998133 | General cargo | 28.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +13% | 12.0 | 420 t | €14k |
| CHANG SHUN II | 9546071 | Bulk carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +13% | 11.1 | 3,304 t | €117k |
| SDM TAICANG | 9949223 | Bulk carrier | 8.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | 0% | 10.3 | 4,985 t | €137k |
| SDM QUANZHOU | 9949259 | Bulk carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −4% | 11.6 | 6,521 t | €180k |
| GREAT FLOURISH | 9988346 | Bulk carrier | 5.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −13% | 13.8 | 6,634 t | €179k |
| GREAT BLOSSOM | 9986910 | Bulk carrier | 3.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.8 | −23% | 13.9 | 3,650 t | €98k |
| COSCO SHIPPING GLORY | 9881641 | General cargo | 16.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −36% | 12.9 | 5,271 t | €164k |
| COSCO SHIPPING HONOR | 9881653 | General cargo | 13.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −46% | 12.3 | 9,877 t | €293k |
| COSCO SHIPPING SINCERE | 9928877 | General cargo | 12.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −53% | 12.2 | 3,410 t | €106k |
| COSCO SHIPPING FAN RONG | 9928906 | General cargo | 10.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −59% | 11.9 | 7,350 t | €225k |
| COSCO SHIPPING PENG BO | 9928920 | General cargo | 9.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −62% | 12.4 | 3,074 t | €89k |
| COSCO SHIPPING TENG DA | 9928932 | General cargo | 9.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −62% | 12.6 | 3,208 t | €94k |
| COSCO SHIPPING WISDOM | 9928889 | General cargo | 9.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −62% | 11.6 | 3,202 t | €94k |
| 21 SUNNY | 9615107 | General cargo | 9.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −63% | 11.7 | 3,700 t | €108k |
| COSCO SHIPPING FOUNTAIN | 9928891 | General cargo | 8.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −66% | 12.0 | 7,830 t | €234k |
| COSCO SHIPPING VISION | 9881677 | General cargo | 8.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −67% | 12.3 | 5,217 t | €148k |
| GREEN OSHIMA | 1027354 | General cargo | 8.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −69% | 12.7 | 4,164 t | €125k |
| GREEN OSAKA | 1027380 | General cargo | 7.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −71% | 12.3 | 2,545 t | €71k |
| COSCO SHIPPING GRACE | 9928865 | General cargo | 6.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −75% | 11.9 | 6,104 t | €177k |
| COSCO SHIPPING CHANG SHENG | 9928918 | General cargo | 5.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −79% | 11.8 | 1,837 t | €49k |
| GREEN YOKOHAMA | 1027378 | General cargo | 5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −80% | 12.9 | 1,681 t | €47k |
| GREEN NAGOYA | 1027366 | General cargo | 4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −84% | 11.9 | 1,404 t | €37k |
30 of 43 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.