Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG

IMO
9893761
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
20,587 t
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.51 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,587 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
70.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.64
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+34%)
Average speed
11.4 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+7%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
507 t
CO₂ emitted
1,580 t
1,605 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
7,212 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
631 h
26 days, 7% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−45%)
76.1Ranks 132 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)
8.0Faster than 72% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+34%)
4.51Ranks 1,122 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU44%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU8%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (850 t).

Fuel burned laden
49%
51% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
7.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−16%−20%+15%+41%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.9 kn−4%−10%−70%−22%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.6 kn+21%+27%−17%−47%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.0 kn+6%+6%−35%+79%Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED5071,5807,21263111.470.310.6449%
2024FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED5241,6456,24552411.983.97.5784%
2023not published1,8085,71720,7641,62212.887.19.72–
2022not published1,7985,68224,9052,04512.272.218.21–
2021not published2,5988,12638,3343,13712.267.810.18–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED10.647.95+34%1,122 of 1,665ClassNKA+C
2024FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED7.578.06−6%792 of 1,787ClassNKB+C
2023not published9.728.44+15%1,078 of 1,797ClassNKB+C
2022not published18.218.51+114%1,645 of 1,961ClassNK–
2021not published10.188.86+15%1,063 of 1,789ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG (IMO 9893761): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2025 | Navalyze