Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EVA FUJI

IMO
9914242
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
14,279 t
Flag (estimated)
Philippines
Port of registry
Manila
Technical efficiency
EEDI 8.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,028 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
79.5
Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−3%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
20.7
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+27%)
Average speed
12.1 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,156 t
CO₂ emitted
6,748 t
Distance sailed
27,115 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,235 h
93 days, 26% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 67.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−16%)
52.8Ranks 420 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 11.1 (−18%)
8.8Faster than 13% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−2%)
7.93Ranks 708 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports16%
  • From the EU24%
  • Into the EU55%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
288 t
4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EVA FUJI
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • EVA FUJI
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EVA FUJI
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.2 kn−9%+4%+42%+3%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−4.2 kn−7%−39%−49%−31%4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.7 kn+7%+25%+25%+4%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.1,3264,15019,7322,1619.167.214.776%
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.1,0263,19813,8481,7497.974.114.387%
2023not published2,1566,74827,1152,23512.179.520.7–
2022not published1,6085,08721,6922,08410.474.219.858%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.14.715.0−2%708 of 1,460Bureau VeritasC
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.14.316.7−15%526 of 1,274Bureau VeritasC
2023not published20.716.2+27%823 of 1,314Bureau VeritasC
2022not published19.816.1+23%878 of 1,409Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.