Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CLEAROCEAN MERIBEL

IMO
9917646
Type
Chemical tanker
Flag (estimated)
Philippines
Port of registry
Manila
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.04 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,109 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
107
Chemical tanker median 84.6 kg/nm (+26%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
22.2
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.1 (+38%)
Average speed
7.4 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−33%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,656 t
CO₂ emitted
5,220 t
Distance sailed
15,549 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,094 h
87 days, 24% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.6 kg/nm · median 81.9 (+3%)
55.0Ranks 720 of 1,314, lowest first115
Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 11.2 (+0%)
9.1Faster than 49% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.49 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.2 (−42%)
9.07Ranks 162 of 1,314, lowest first43.8
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports34%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU10%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
959 t
58% of all fuel; 42% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
483 t
9.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CLEAROCEAN MERIBEL
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • CLEAROCEAN MERIBEL
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CLEAROCEAN MERIBEL
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2022→2023+3.8 kn−21%+20%+121%−57%3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−4.8 kn−14%−47%+260%+4%4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.00–0––––
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.00–0––––
2023not published2,9019,11934,3033,05711.284.69.49–
2022not published1,6565,22015,5492,0947.410722.258%
2021not published5341,6704,32035512.212421.351%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.––––Bureau VeritasC
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.––––Bureau VeritasC
2023not published9.4916.2−42%162 of 1,314Bureau VeritasC
2022not published22.216.1+38%976 of 1,409Bureau VeritasC
2021not published21.316.7+28%890 of 1,343Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.