Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CLEAROCEAN MILANO

IMO: 9917658
Type: Chemical tanker
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.04 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,667 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

130

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (+57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+13%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

345 t

CO₂ emitted

1,083 t

Distance sailed

2,657 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

291 h

12 days, 3% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.0 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+15%)

53.8Ranks 894 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 11.0 (+8%)

8.7Faster than 78% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (−32%)

8.47Ranks 350 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU13%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

315 t

91% of all fuel; 9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

96 t

8.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLEAROCEAN MILANO
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CLEAROCEAN MILANO
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLEAROCEAN MILANO
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+11%	+0%	+8%	−18%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.1 kn	+8%	+28%	+2%	+48%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.1 kn	−40%	−27%	+856%	−50%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	2,606	8,229	28,027	2,346	11.9	93.0	11.4	62%
2023	not published	2,173	6,789	25,988	1,955	13.3	83.6	13.8	–
2022	not published	1,973	6,168	25,390	2,268	11.2	77.7	9.36	70%
2021	not published	345	1,083	2,657	291	9.1	130	18.8	91%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	11.4	16.7	−32%	350 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	13.8	16.2	−15%	505 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	9.36	16.1	−42%	168 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	18.8	16.7	+13%	796 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.