Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EVA MANILA

IMO
9918602
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
12,616 t
Flag (estimated)
Philippines
Port of registry
Manila
Technical efficiency
EEDI 8.18 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,804 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
73.2
Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−11%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
19.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+20%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
22.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,511 t
CO₂ emitted
7,893 t
Distance sailed
34,291 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,669 h
111 days, 30% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−0%)
52.8Ranks 724 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 11.1 (−25%)
8.8Faster than 8% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+32%)
7.93Ranks 937 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports47%
  • From the EU10%
  • Into the EU22%
  • At berth in the EU21%
Fuel burned laden
1,509 t
60% of all fuel; 40% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,688 t
21.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EVA MANILA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • EVA MANILA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EVA MANILA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn−10%−12%+4%−3%Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−4.3 kn+21%−20%−38%+5%4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.0 kn+2%+3%+41%−28%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.1,7515,52822,0202,6618.379.519.978%
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.1,8825,90721,2662,5098.588.520.483%
2023not published2,5117,89334,2912,66912.873.219.560%
2022not published1,7505,49824,3791,91212.871.827.249%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.19.915.0+32%937 of 1,460Bureau VeritasC
2024VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.20.416.7+22%789 of 1,274Bureau VeritasC
2023not published19.516.2+20%773 of 1,314Bureau VeritasC
2022not published27.216.1+69%1,084 of 1,409Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.