Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM GRACE BAY

IMO: 9938145
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 99,582 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 99,582 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

228.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.41

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−61%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

82.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,732 t

CO₂ emitted

55,216 t

63,778 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

86,502 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,711 h

238 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 228.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+29%)

78.8Ranks 1,464 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 79% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−61%)

7.22Ranks 108 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU39%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

47% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (26,069 t).

Fuel burned laden

98%

2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

282.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.155

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM GRACE BAY
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM GRACE BAY
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM GRACE BAY
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−10%	−14%	+63%	−6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	CMA SHIPS SAS	19,732	55,216	86,502	5,711	15.1	228.1	6.41	98%
2024LNG	CMA SHIPS SAS	13,434	39,004	53,091	3,350	15.8	253.0	6.82	98%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	CMA SHIPS SAS	6.41	16.30	−61%	108 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024LNG	CMA SHIPS SAS	6.82	17.52	−61%	136 of 1,974	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.