Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship
EVA HANSA
- IMO
- 9985980
- Type
- Chemical tanker
- Average cargo carried
- 15,226 t
- Flag (estimated)
- Philippines
- Port of registry
- Manila
- Technical efficiency
- EEDI 7.18 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management
2023 at a glance
From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,258 t of cargo on average.
Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025
Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2023
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports0%
- From the EU18%
- Into the EU69%
- At berth in the EU14%
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- EVA HANSA
- Chemical tanker median
Average speed, kn
- EVA HANSA
- Chemical tanker median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- EVA HANSA
- Chemical tanker median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +3.6 kn | −24% | +32% | +94% | −33% | 3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −9.3 kn | +43% | −51% | +468% | +76% | 9.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. | 2,417 | 7,599 | 34,021 | 4,066 | 8.4 | 71.0 | 14.7 | 81% |
| 2024 | VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. | 1,635 | 5,107 | 17,520 | 3,650 | 4.8 | 93.3 | 22.0 | 74% |
| 2023 | not published | 201 | 628 | 3,087 | 219 | 14.1 | 65.1 | 12.5 | 72% |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Chemical tanker median | vs Chemical tanker | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. | 14.7 | 15.0 | −2% | 705 of 1,460 | Bureau Veritas | C |
| 2024 | VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. | 22.0 | 16.7 | +32% | 828 of 1,274 | Bureau Veritas | C |
| 2023 | not published | 12.5 | 16.2 | −23% | 392 of 1,314 | Bureau Veritas | C |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.