Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KGyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 19 |
| CO₂ emitted | 149 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 56 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 11.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 11.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG42.5 (+154% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 14 | 42.5 | +154% | 58 | 11.2 | 4,267 | 11.7% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG36.6 (+354% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 4 | 36.6 | +354% | 45 | 10.8 | 4,051 | 12.3% | 2 |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG19.7 (+12% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | 1 | 19.7 | +12% | 104 | 12.8 | 460 | 10.5% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG | EnvService (19) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
John T. Essberger GmbH & CO. KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBERHART ESSBERGERLNG | 9939802 | Oil tanker | 38.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +54% | 11.2 | 5,005 t | €144k |
| LISELOTTE ESSBERGER | 9939785 | Oil tanker | 37.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +49% | 10.4 | 6,594 t | €179k |
| JOHN T. ESSBERGERLNG | 9939797 | Oil tanker | 35.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +41% | 10.6 | 6,274 t | €175k |
| HELGA ESSBERGER | 9172155 | Chemical tanker | 54.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +33% | 11.0 | 9,308 t | €270k |
| ROLAND ESSBERGER | 9504217 | Chemical tanker | 54.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +32% | 11.2 | 7,307 t | €193k |
| GISELA ESSBERGER | 9147734 | Chemical tanker | 53.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +29% | 10.2 | 9,363 t | €275k |
| HEINRICH ESSBERGER | 9939814 | Oil tanker | 30.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +22% | 11.3 | 5,461 t | €128k |
| CORAL ESSBERGER | 9504205 | Chemical tanker | 49.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +21% | 11.3 | 9,594 t | €260k |
| CUNO ESSBERGER | 9504190 | Chemical tanker | 47.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +16% | 11.4 | 10,986 t | €302k |
| AGNES ESSBERGER | 9327047 | Chemical tanker | 46.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +14% | 10.5 | 8,553 t | €248k |
| ANNETTE ESSBERGER | 9327059 | Chemical tanker | 46.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +13% | 10.9 | 9,960 t | €291k |
| ELLEN ESSBERGER | 9272747 | Chemical tanker | 38.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −7% | 11.7 | 8,147 t | €234k |
| LIESEL ESSBERGER | 9272761 | Chemical tanker | 38.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −7% | 11.5 | 8,283 t | €232k |
| ANNELIESE ESSBERGER | 9295426 | Chemical tanker | 38.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −8% | 11.6 | 8,153 t | €238k |
| UBENA | 9690078 | Container | 19.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −10% | 12.8 | 1,907 t | €32k |
| AMALIE ESSBERGER | 9314777 | Chemical tanker | 36.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −11% | 11.3 | 8,235 t | €231k |
| WILHELMINE ESSBERGER | 9295440 | Chemical tanker | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −13% | 11.2 | 8,932 t | €245k |
| LISA ESSBERGER | 9295438 | Chemical tanker | 35.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −14% | 11.5 | 8,210 t | €221k |
| CAROLINE ESSBERGER | 9439151 | Chemical tanker | 33.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −19% | 11.0 | 8,574 t | €245k |
30 of 19 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.