Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- OSM Ship Management ASyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| OSM Ship Management AS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 9 |
| CO₂ emitted | 46 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 80 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 11.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- OSM Ship Management AS15.0 (−10% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management AS | 8 | 15.0 | −10% | 79 | 9.4 | 2,546 | 11.1% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- OSM Ship Management AS57.2 (+610% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management AS | 1 | 57.2 | +610% | 81 | 10.0 | 3,988 | 14.0% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSM Ship Management AS | DNV (9) | 56% | 89% | 100% | 0% |
OSM Ship Management AS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIISLA | 9267558 | Oil tanker | 57.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +127% | 10.0 | 10,338 t | €306k |
| SUULA | 9267560 | Chemical tanker | 50.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +22% | 9.7 | 11,689 t | €351k |
| HAFNIA AMAZONITE | 9719769 | Chemical tanker | 13.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | +15% | 8.3 | 3,451 t | €61k |
| HAFNIA AMETRINE | 9714513 | Chemical tanker | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −9% | 9.5 | 3,019 t | €59k |
30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.