Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Uni-Tankers A/Syour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Uni-Tankers A/S | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 3 |
| CO₂ emitted | 11 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 56 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.7 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 10.0% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Uni-Tankers A/S35.8 (+114% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uni-Tankers A/S | 3 | 35.8 | +114% | 56 | 10.7 | 1,878 | 10.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uni-Tankers A/S | ABS (3) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Uni-Tankers A/S: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MONA SWAN | 9371804 | Chemical tanker | 51.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +25% | 10.1 | 3,657 t | €64k |
| JUTLANDIA SWAN | 9736638 | Chemical tanker | 35.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −13% | 10.5 | 4,619 t | €102k |
| ERRIA SWAN | 9347748 | Chemical tanker | 26.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | −35% | 11.6 | 2,238 t | €54k |
30 of 3 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.