Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Systemar LLCyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Systemar LLC | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 4 |
| CO₂ emitted | 19 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 86 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 8.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 11.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Systemar LLC25.4 (+215% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systemar LLC | 4 | 25.4 | +215% | 86 | 8.3 | 2,100 | 11.5% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systemar LLC | Verifavia (4) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Systemar LLC: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEOPOLD | 9173032 | Oil tanker | 35.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +40% | 8.3 | 1,816 t | €28k |
| MOUNT MCKINNEY | 9263174 | Oil tanker | 28.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | +12% | 8.3 | 5,421 t | €97k |
| MOUNT OLYMPUS | 9260081 | Oil tanker | 22.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | −11% | 6.7 | 4,037 t | €73k |
| PIONEER | 9260079 | Oil tanker | 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | −28% | 9.4 | 7,353 t | €25k |
30 of 4 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.