Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Central Mare Incyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Central Mare Inc | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 69 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 111 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.0 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Oil tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Central Mare Inc4.7 (−42% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Mare Inc | 3 | 4.7 | −42% | 144 | 11.8 | 2,342 | 6.3% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Central Mare Inc13.8 (−17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Mare Inc | 4 | 13.8 | −17% | 86 | 12.2 | 2,402 | 8.5% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Mare Inc | ABS (7) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Central Mare Inc: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO WEST COAST | 9902811 | Oil tanker | 5.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +16% | 11.9 | 16,678 t | €341k |
| ECO FLEET | 9717503 | Chemical tanker | 18.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | +12% | 12.5 | 7,760 t | €141k |
| ECO MALIBU | 9902823 | Oil tanker | 4.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +4% | 12.0 | 15,026 t | €247k |
| ECO YOSEMITE PARK | 9877573 | Chemical tanker | 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | +1% | 11.8 | 8,991 t | €163k |
| ECO REVOLUTION | 9725598 | Chemical tanker | 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 16.5 | −6% | 12.1 | 11,240 t | €253k |
| ECO JOSHUA PARK | 9877585 | Chemical tanker | 11.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −6% | 12.7 | 3,807 t | €59k |
| LEGIO X EQUESTRIS | 9912256 | Oil tanker | 4.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | −8% | 11.3 | 5,870 t | €102k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.