Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA DANICA

IMO: 7907245
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Gothenburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

610

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

228

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−3%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

51.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,955 t

CO₂ emitted

31,488 t

Distance sailed

65,744 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,658 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 154 kg/nm · median 150 (+3%)

69.3Ranks 216 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 20% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 656 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+16%)

66.8Ranks 221 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 222 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−12%)

48.6Ranks 188 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,028 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA DANICA
Ro-pax median

150.0155.0160.0165.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA DANICA
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA DANICA
Ro-pax median

150175200225250275

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA DANICA
Ro-pax median

4006008001,0001,2001,400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+1%	−2%	−9%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	+13%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−5%	+8%	+2%	−8%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+2%	−9%	+3%	−48%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−3%	−14%	+32%	+30%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−4%	+6%	−31%	+68%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	+4%	−18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	10,340	32,477	67,104	5,064	13.3	154	–	–
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	11,318	35,799	74,028	5,455	13.6	153	–	–
2023	not published	9,955	31,488	65,744	4,658	14.1	151	–	–
2022	not published	10,305	32,605	64,761	5,229	12.4	159	–	–
2021	not published	9,778	31,349	62,948	4,518	13.9	155	–	–
2020	not published	7,597	24,194	47,693	3,035	15.7	159	–	–
2019	not published	11,486	36,315	69,534	4,845	14.4	165	–	–
2018	not published	11,260	35,506	66,870	4,792	14.0	168	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	656	567	+16%	221 of 408	222	253	−12%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	707	547	+29%	238 of 404	232	233	−0%	DNV	C
2023	not published	610	680	−10%	178 of 386	228	234	−3%	DNV	C
2022	not published	662	626	+6%	204 of 394	220	253	−13%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,264	815	+55%	284 of 377	207	226	−8%	DNV	C
2020	not published	971	751	+29%	218 of 387	159	217	−27%	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	576	569	+1%	201 of 394	179	223	−19%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	700	729	−4%	178 of 361	173	184	−6%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.