Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MEDITERRANEE

IMO: 8705395
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

223

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

561

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

20.6 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,920 t

CO₂ emitted

21,603 t

Distance sailed

31,004 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,505 h

63 days, 17% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 183 kg/nm · median 150 (+22%)

69.3Ranks 302 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.2 kn · median 15.8 (+15%)

12.0Faster than 72% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 531 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−6%)

66.8Ranks 193 of 408, lowest first1,569

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,067 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MEDITERRANEE
Ro-pax median

0.0500.01,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MEDITERRANEE
Ro-pax median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MEDITERRANEE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	−3%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	−1%	−89%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−25%	−32%	+4%	+682%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+12.6 kn	−79%	−45%	+29,877%	–	12.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 79%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−8.9 kn	+402%	+132%	−99%	–	8.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 402%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	+11%	−4%	−76%	+53%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−7%	−14%	+27%	−1%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CORSICA LINEA	5,836	18,712	31,830	1,745	18.2	183	–	–
2024Alt. fuel	CORSICA LINEA	6,119	17,955	32,867	1,813	18.1	186	–	–
2023	not published	6,060	17,950	33,237	1,804	18.4	182	–	–
2022	not published	7,752	24,191	32,075	1,581	20.3	242	–	–
2021	not published	123	391	107	14	7.7	1,153	–	–
2020	not published	2,133	6,690	9,294	559	16.6	230	–	–
2019	not published	8,171	25,502	39,408	2,061	19.1	207	–	–
2018	not published	6,920	21,603	31,004	1,505	20.6	223	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	CORSICA LINEA	531	567	−6%	193 of 408	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024Alt. fuel	CORSICA LINEA	406	547	−26%	172 of 404	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	3,723	680	+447%	381 of 386	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	476	626	−24%	169 of 394	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	851	751	+13%	206 of 387	1,315	217	+505%	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	558	569	−2%	192 of 394	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	561	729	−23%	157 of 361	–	–	–	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.