Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VIKING CINDERELLA

IMO: 8719188
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Mariehamn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VIKING LINE Abp

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

153

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

320

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

824

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+265%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−35%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,260 t

CO₂ emitted

23,276 t

Distance sailed

47,400 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,455 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 150 (−3%)

69.3Ranks 184 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)

12.0Faster than 50% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 96.0 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−83%)

66.8Ranks 70 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 393 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+55%)

48.6Ranks 247 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports82%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU18%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,250 t

18.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VIKING CINDERELLA
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIKING CINDERELLA
Ro-pax median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VIKING CINDERELLA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VIKING CINDERELLA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−2%	+5%	+9%	−19%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.8 kn	+4%	+41%	+20%	−52%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+8%	+14%	+10%	−11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−13%	−16%	+43%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	−12%	+2%	+77%	−30%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+33%	+35%	−54%	+49%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+1%	+3%	−5%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	VIKING LINE Abp	14,246	45,672	97,829	6,212	15.7	146	–	–
2024	VIKING LINE AB	13,375	42,881	89,811	6,106	14.7	149	–	–
2023	not published	10,725	34,385	74,650	6,874	10.9	144	–	–
2022	not published	8,986	28,810	67,600	6,580	10.3	133	–	–
2021	not published	7,260	23,276	47,400	4,455	10.6	153	–	–
2020	not published	4,683	14,766	26,800	2,928	9.2	175	–	–
2019	not published	7,605	23,963	58,100	6,437	9.0	131	–	–
2018	not published	7,900	24,893	61,100	6,846	8.9	129	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	VIKING LINE Abp	96.0	567	−83%	70 of 408	393	253	+55%	Verifavia	C
2024	VIKING LINE AB	118	547	−78%	93 of 404	519	233	+123%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	245	680	−64%	104 of 386	878	234	+275%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	276	626	−56%	119 of 394	762	253	+201%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	320	815	−61%	121 of 377	824	226	+265%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	458	751	−39%	138 of 387	1,752	217	+705%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	307	569	−46%	126 of 394	1,241	223	+458%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	297	729	−59%	116 of 361	975	184	+430%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.