Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- VIKING LINE Abpyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| VIKING LINE Abp | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 216 kt+0.7% |
| Fuel per mile | 142 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 15.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Ro-pax |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Ro-pax
CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 567
- VIKING LINE Abp96.0 (−83% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 253
- VIKING LINE Abp248 (−2% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work (pax) | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIKING LINE Abp | 5 | 96.0 248 freight | −83% −2% freight | 142 | 15.9 | 6,376 | 5.3% | 2 |
| Segment median | 567 253 freight | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIKING LINE Abp | Verifavia (5) | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
VIKING LINE Abp: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIKING XPRS | 9375654 | Ro-pax | 131 g CO₂/pax·nm 248 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −77% −2% | 17.8 | 37,030 t | €1.9m |
| GABRIELLA | 8917601 | Ro-pax | 100 g CO₂/pax·nm 386 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −82% +53% | 15.6 | 44,903 t | €813k |
| VIKING CINDERELLA | 8719188 | Ro-pax | 96.0 g CO₂/pax·nm 393 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −83% +55% | 15.7 | 45,672 t | €891k |
| VIKING GLORYLNG | 9827877 | Ro-pax | 66.7 g CO₂/pax·nm 186 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −88% −27% | 15.6 | 42,584 t | €693k |
| VIKING GRACELNG | 9606900 | Ro-pax | 62.7 g CO₂/pax·nm 184 g CO₂/t·nm freight | 567 253 | −89% −27% | 15.6 | 45,932 t | €691k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.